.transparent-header.view-list .banner-thumbnail-wrapper, .transparent-header.collection-type-page .banner-thumbnail-wrapper { padding: 160px 0 110px; }

New NIH Strategy Plan Supports Food is Medicine

By Anne Scott Livingston

The use of food to prevent and treat chronic diseases has gained attention in recent years, and many are recognizing the benefits of this approach. Members of the nutrition community have emphasized nutrition's role in healthcare, calling for the use of food as a treatment for chronic illnesses, and highlighting that nutrition should be a top priority in our healthcare system. Over the years, many coalitions have also formed at the national and state level to advocate for change such as Food is Medicine Coalition, Food is Medicine Massachusetts (FIMMA), Food is Medicine Collaborative of San Francisco, and the National Produce Prescription Collaborative. 

Building on this FIM momentum, the National Institute of Health’s (NIH) recently released its 2020-2030 Strategic Plan for Nutrition Research, which incorporates a specific focus on food as medicine. This plan aims to advance nutrition research over the next 10 years and will concentrate on individualized nutrition, the link between nutrition and disease risk, and the use of FIM in clinical settings. This new strategic plan is an exciting step in the process of integrating FIM into health care, and shows federal recognition of nutrition’s importance in preventing and treating the burden of chronic diseases.

Historically, dietary guidance has typically consisted of broad recommendations assuming a one-size-fits-all approach to nutrition. The NIH’s new strategic plan advocates for Precision Nutrition, which aims to provide individualized, actionable dietary recommendations. This vision recognizes that individuals vary greatly in their personal dietary responses and linkages between diet and disease risk. 

The plan outlines four main goals:

  1. Spur Discovery and Innovation through Foundational Research- What do we eat and how does it affect us?

  2. Investigate the Role of Dietary Patterns and Behaviors for Optimal Health- What and when should we eat?

  3. Define the Role of Nutrition Across the Lifespan- How does what we eat promote health across our lifespan?

  4. Reduce the Burden of Disease in Clinical Settings- How can we improve the use of food as medicine?

Additionally, the plan highlights five Cross-Cutting Research Areas relevant to the main goals: minority health and health disparities, health of women, rigor and reproducibility, data science, systems science and artificial intelligence and training the nutrition science workforce.

National Institutes of Health

National Institutes of Health

Continued research has shown the power of good nutrition to both prevent and treat diseases, and scaling this to an individual level provides an opportunity to further optimize health. The NIH’s focus on the use of food as medicine is just one of several recent developments that highlight the growing interest in FIM. Other initiatives focused on enhancing and expanding FIM include the Federal MTM Bill, the California Pilot, and the Massachusetts Food and Health Pilot. The NIH’s aim to accelerate research on FIM recognizes the power of food in healthcare and is another important and exciting step in expanding the use of food as medicine.

Challenges, Adaptations, and New Opportunities: Updates from FIMMA’s Spring Meeting

Leah Costlow, Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy ‘21

At the quarterly spring meeting of Food is Medicine Massachusetts (FIMMA), held via video call on May 27th, leaders from member organizations provided insights into what COVID-19 has meant for their work. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to influence FIMMA member organizations and Food is Medicine (FIM) policies in complex ways. As the public health crisis and its ramifications develop, FIMMA member organizations have adapted their operations to respond to increased need for FIM services, spikes in food insecurity more broadly, and newly complex logistical challenges. Simultaneously, the roll-out of Flexible Services (FS) has continued more or less as planned, offering FIM organizations new opportunities to provide innovative services while accommodating public health measures.

Jean Terranova of Community Servings noted that the FS Prep Fund has allowed her organization to implement new technology forming a bridge between their referral platform and ACO referral platforms. Project Bread and Just Roots have employed a similar “data bridge” strategy using Prep Fund resources. MassHealth and FIMMA member organizations including Community Care Cooperative have adapted FS to fit new program needs—for example, adding grocery store gift cards and food vouchers to the array of services offered. These innovations are promising examples of the benefits FS can provide, particularly as the process will soon begin for submitting comments and recommendations to MassHealth concerning the next 1115 waiver. A graduate student working with FIMMA has started a project collecting feedback on community-based organizations’ experiences with ACOs; the data collected from this project will be a rich resource for these comments.

Despite the adaptability that FS can offer in some areas, FIM organizations are facing new logistical challenges posed by critical public health measures and the ripple effects propagating throughout the economy. Enforcing social distancing protocols during operations is a key challenge for many organizations, while others have struggled to replace their usual cohort of older and at-risk volunteers, who are advised to stay home. Adriene Worthington of the Greater Boston Food Bank observed that their need to purchase food has increased as donation patterns have shifted: “Since people have been grocery shopping, a lot of grocery partners don’t have food to donate.” Meanwhile, programs like Meals On Wheels have been working to find alternative, socially distanced ways of checking in on clients and creating client socialization opportunities in the absence of congregate dining.

As FIM organizations adapt services in these ways and in real time, FIMMA and its Task Forces are pushing ahead on key projects relating to the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Focus Areas, while celebrating promising developments for FIM legislative initiatives. At the federal level, Congressman Jim McGovern and co-sponsors introduced H.R. 6774, or the Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Demonstration Pilot Act, which would evaluate the impacts of medically tailored meal interventions for seniors with chronic disease, with at least 20 participating hospitals in at least 10 states. If enacted, this pilot would result in even more expanded literature and evidence for the benefits of FIM interventions. Similarly, the 2020-2030 Strategic Plan for National Institutes of Health Nutrition Research was released on May 27th, outlining strategic goals that include Food is Medicine as a priority research area.

In the Massachusetts legislature, FIM pilot bills have had a favorable reception in the Senate and House. As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolds, legislative priorities may shift in unexpected ways that could detract from efforts to shine a spotlight on these pilot bills. At the same time, FIMMA members recognize a chance to amplify the importance of FIM interventions during the public health crisis and will be working with legislative sponsors to develop a strategy that highlights the connection between nutrition and individual COVID-19 outcomes.

These policy and legislative developments are exciting opportunities for FIMMA organizations to share compelling stories, lessons, and insights for the future, particularly at a moment in time that finds organizations reacting, adapting, and evolving to meet unprecedented demand for nutrition services. FIMMA is continuing to produce case studies in its Voices From The Field series and will be conducting interviews about Flexible Services during July. In addition, there are many other opportunities for FIMMA members to contribute knowledge and experience to the advocacy process. Contact us with questions or to let us know how you would like to participate!

Medically Tailored Meal Services Are Critical to COVID-19 Response Efforts, Yet Most Lack Adequate Support

The Bringing Food Home During COVID-19 webinar exposes the challenges MTM providers face in responding to a new epidemic and discusses opportunities to boost political and economic support.

Medically tailored meal (MTM) providers were suddenly in high alert when the coronavirus pandemic began unfolding in the United States due to the high-risk nature of their clients. As the disease spread and more stay at home orders were issued, individual care plans continued to be disrupted, and food unemployment and food insecurity rates rose. All of a sudden, there was a much greater need for MTM interventions since they already had the infrastructure and expertise needed to deliver meals to high risk populations. However, as food providers who deliver medical interventions, MTM organizations have existed in an informal space between our food and health care systems for years, lacking the supporting infrastructure and funding of either. Now, as critical responders in this crisis who are straining themselves to meet demand, MTM providers are asking policymakers to formally recognize their significance by including them in policy decisions, providing more support for nonprofit food providers in the federal and state response packages, and integrating these services into the health care system by making medically tailored meals a reimbursable service.

On April 9, the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (CHLPI) of Harvard Law School and the Food is Medicine Coalition (FIMC) organized a webinar, Bringing Food Home During COVID-19: Medically Tailored Meal Nonprofits Respond to a New Epidemic where MTM providers shared their experiences with having to shift operations, navigate supply challenges, and respond to this surge in demand during the COVID-19 crisis.

MTM interventions provide home-delivered, individually tailored meals to individuals with serious illness or disability who cannot shop or cook for themselves. Individuals are generally referred to MTM services providers by health care personnel and the intervention includes nutrition assessments conducted by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists and access to ongoing nutrition support.

Source: Bringing Food Home During COVID-19 webinar. This slide provides an example of a typical client profile for a  Community Servings client.

Source: Bringing Food Home During COVID-19 webinar. This slide provides an example of a typical client profile for a Community Servings client.

Typically, recipients of these interventions are extremely sick. Many of these organizations were founded in the 1980’s and 1990’s during the HIV/AIDS epidemic to provide meals to individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Many MTM clients today suffer from multiple comorbidities. Sixty-five percent of the individuals served by FIMC in 2019 were living with comorbidities and 10% were living with a mental health diagnosis in addition to their chronic disease. Research has shown that these interventions can decrease inpatient admissions and health care utilization which is critical to protecting precious the health care resources that communities need most. The presenters summarized the connection between MTM services and COVID-19:  

Medically Tailored Meals & COVID:

  • The typical MTM clients are most at risk for suffering very serious complications from COVID-19

  • MTM have been shown to reduce inpatient hospital admissions and emergency department visits- exactly what we want for this population right now

  • Reliable and safe home delivery of nutrition services has become more critical than ever before

  • To respond to COVID-19, MTM organizations have completely changed their model of operations almost overnight, significantly increasing costs

  • MTM organizations are seeing unprecedented demand for services from all directions

Panelists on the webinar discussed how medically tailored meal providers are being asked to serve new populations. Cathryn Couch, CEO of Ceres Community Project in California relayed experiences with health care partners reaching out to ask Ceres Community Project if they could provide meals for individuals who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or are being asked to quarantine at home. Additionally, some other California MTM agencies have been asked to take on Medicare in-home supportive services clients who have lost caregiver supports while community health centers have reached out to try to provide MTM services for individuals who are at increased risk and cannot frequent food pantries.

We are not included in the emergency food system, yet our communities are specifically looking to medically tailored meal providers to be part of the response. There has been a shift that has happened, that is happening, in terms of the recognition that are clients will not have their needs met by the normal food and nutrition security solutions that exist in our communities.
— Cathryn Couch, CEO of Ceres Community Project

Alissa Wassung, Director of Policy and Planning for God’s Love We Deliver in New York City, described the challenges brought on by the disruption of home health aide services, mentioning that “home health aides may not be able to visit as much, or as often, or even at all anymore. It leaves this population open to extreme food insecurity and a lot fear.” Moveable Feast in Maryland seemed to be experiencing many of the same challenges. Sara Zisow-McClean, Director of Programs of Moveable Feast, shared that aside from a surge in their normal clientele, the organization has expanded their services to provide meals to individuals who have recently been moved from shelters to other forms of temporary housing such as hotel and has started helping out other food providers in the area to boost food delivery for seniors.

As normal pathways for care and resources continue to be disrupted, more and more people are looking to MTM providers to step in and assist. MTM providers are always willing and interested to step to the plate and help, however, Cathryn Couch, CEO of Ceres Community Project in California, has noticed that there seems to be a disconnect between need, the services employed to meet the need, and the funding structures that support those programs. “We are not included in the emergency food system, yet our communities are specifically looking to MTM providers to be part of the response,” she said, adding that, “there has been a shift that has happened, that is happening, in terms of the recognition that are clients will not have their needs met by the normal food and nutrition security solutions that exist in our communities.” Lastly, she stressed the need for support for MTM organizations, pointing out that “there are no structures in place like there are for the councils of aging, Meals on Wheels programs, or even the food banks to access federal and state funding in the same ways.”

Representatives from FIMC member organizations shared the lessons they are collectively learning throughout their response efforts:

Lessons Learned: Toward a More Resilient Health Care & Food Safety Net System

  • COVID has exposed the fragility and weaknesses of our society’s nutrition safety net; MTM are a critical service and must be a priority

  • There is a desperate need for more coordination of public and private efforts to meet nutrition needs, especially in times of crisis

  • MTM providers need to partner with organizations across the spectrum of food and nutrition services in order to meet the full range of need

  • Integration with health care (existing partnerships) supports and facilitates the delivery of services to those who need the most

  • The more we learn about COVID-19 and who is most at risk, the more we know that food and nutrition interventions in health care are the key to a more equitable system in the future

Given the current evidence surrounding these interventions and the experience these organizations have nourishing vulnerable residents during a crisis, it is no surprise that demand has been increasing throughout the coronavirus pandemic. MTM providers continue to alter operations and innovate systems to meet this need, but these organizations are operating at full capacity and draining their resources in the process. As David Waters, CEO of Community Servings in Boston said, “many of the normal systems have broken down. It is up to food providers like FIMC members to design new systems to make this all happen almost overnight. The connections to emergency preparedness or public health or health care are frayed because everyone is doing the best they can but everyone has their head down trying to power through this. We rely on collaboration.” Cathryn Couch echoed that MTM providers have been doing this work for years, yet acknowledged a long road ahead.

There is significant work we need to do to place ourselves in that food safety net and to build those relationships, policy solutions, and funding sources that allow us to be more readily part of the policy solutions in this kind moment… We’re not embedded in a way that would allow us to scale up quickly and to have the funding to do so.
— Cathryn Couch, CEO Ceres Community Project

The panelists underlined the value of applying both a systems-level and policy perspective in efforts to understand where we must go and how we can change. Alissa Wassung from God’s Love We Deliver emphasized the need for enhanced coordination and the importance of creating ever more integrated systems. She highlighted that “The experience of COVID has demonstrated how much our country has relied on nonprofits to do public health on a daily basis.” While focusing on policy, Alissa also stressed that there should be a focus on how we bolster and support the social services safety net so it continues to be vibrant for future crises. “Because of the siloes that exist in the food system and the health care system, there has been a lot of difficultly mobilizing the food system on mass and connecting it to the emergency response from the medical field. Each of the separate feeding systems addresses a different population that is much more vulnerable in this setting.” Lastly, she drew our attention back to the fact that MTM agencies and the interventions often get left out of the planning calculus in emergencies because they are not part of a specific funding stream.

In closing, the FIMC members presented paths forward which would strengthen the recognition and support for these services in response to the coronavirus crisis and reinforce a vision for a more equitable, nutrition-oriented health care system moving forward:  

Take Action! Future Directions

  • Government and policymakers must plan for the future, and MTM provider organizations and clients must have a seat at the table

  • The federal government and states are taking action in response to COVID (for example, the recently passes CARES Act). These responses must support nonprofits in order to enable a nimble, rapid response in the event of a crisis like COVID

  • MTMs should be a reimbursable health care services, especially within Medicare and Medicaid

    • Demonstrations in CA, MA, NY, and NC

    • Additional health care partnerships mean that meals reach thousands of individuals each year

Hey States with Medicaid 1915(c) Waivers - Use Your Appendix K Modifications to Ensure Continued Care for the Most Vulnerable Patients!

By Margaret Dushko, Harvard Law School ‘21

Medicaid 1915(c) Home and Community Based Services Waivers keep vulnerable patients from needing institutional care by providing services at home and in the community like coverage for home health aides and home-delivered meals. Emergency Appendix K modifications present a critical opportunity for states utilizing the Medicaid 1915(c) Home and Community Based Services Waivers to ensure vulnerable patients continue to receive the care they need during the COVID-19 pandemic. These modifications allow states to ensure continued care and to add services and coverage that will help patients stay healthy and safe during this pandemic. We therefore encourage states to take advantage of this opportunity to protect their residents.

Background: HCBS Waivers and Emergency Appendix K Changes

Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waivers allow states to provide additional services at home and in community settings for Medicaid beneficiaries who would otherwise require institutional care. States can have multiple 1915(c) waivers addressing the needs of different target populations – for example, a state might have one 1915(c) waiver for patients with traumatic brain injuries and another for elderly patients. These waivers can provide a wide range of services, including home health aides, assistive technology, and home-delivered meals.

Medicaid Section 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Services Waivers Participants, 2018

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation’s State Health Facts, Data source: Medicaid HCBSProgram Surveys, FY 2018. Accessed April 22, 2020. 

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation’s State Health Facts, Data source: Medicaid HCBS

Program Surveys, FY 2018. Accessed April 22, 2020. 

CMS allows states to modify their HCBS waivers in response to public health emergencies like COVID-19 through Appendix K waiver modifications. In anticipation of many states requesting such waivers given the widespread impact of COVID-19 on health care systems, CMS has published a template for COVID-19-related Appendix K changes. This template provides a number of potential changes states can make to their HCBS programs in response to the pandemic.

KFF Appendix K.png

Because individuals receiving care in institutions have a limited ability to practice social distancing, and providers at such institutions face the same protective equipment shortages facing other health care providers, both residents and workers in long-term care institutions face a higher risk of COVID-19 transmission. Patients in these facilities are often elderly or have serious chronic illness - meaning they are also at increased risk of severe disease resulting from COVID-19 infection. Ensuring that patients at risk of needing institutional care can stay in their homes will help minimize these risks.

Opportunity: Add Home-Delivered Meals

Nutrition is an essential element of health, especially for the most vulnerable patients and particularly now during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, in a study among hospitalized patients with the same diagnoses, malnourished patients were almost twice as likely to be readmitted to the hospital within two weeks and faced higher mortality rates across the three years following hospitalization. Poor nutrition can also impact the body’s response to infectious disease; studies of previous outbreaks of coronavirus diseases illustrated that diet-related diseases like type II diabetes were associated with more severe illness and higher mortality rates.

With skyrocketing unemployment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, more and more Americans are facing food insecurity, and food banks are struggling to meet the increased demand. Given the importance of nutrition to health outcomes and immunity, it is essential to ensure that everyone has access to sufficient and nutritious food – particularly those patients most at risk of severe disease with COVID-19.

One critical change states can make to their HCBS programs through Appendix K is to add home-delivered meals to the list of covered services. Home delivered meals will directly benefit patients by ensuring they are properly nourished, improving immunity and minimizing the impact of increasing food insecurity on their health. Furthermore, home-delivered meals will allow these patients to more effectively practice social distancing by reducing their need to make trips outside the home for food.

Although CMS has included the addition of home-delivered meals as an option within their Appendix K template for COVID-19, only 8 states have opted to expand meals access in response to the COVID-19 crisis as of April 22, 2020 (Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oklahoma). In addition, 4 of the states that have expanded meal access have not expanded access for all waiver participants.

MANNA is a non-profit food provider in Philadelphia that delivers medically tailored meals to individuals battling life-threatening illnesses such as cancer, renal disease, and HIV/AIDS.

MANNA is a non-profit food provider in Philadelphia that delivers medically tailored meals to individuals battling life-threatening illnesses such as cancer, renal disease, and HIV/AIDS.

Opportunity: Maximize Eligibility

States can also modify eligibility requirements through Appendix K. Patients should not have to worry about losing their coverage in the middle of a pandemic. Fortunately, almost all states (25/27) that have submitted a COVID-19-related Appendix K amendment to their waiver have allowed remote assessments to take the place of regular in-person assessments. Furthermore, 22 states have extended the timeline for reassessment of patient eligibility to ensure that patients do not lose coverage during the crisis. These changes will help ensure patients already receiving these services maintain their coverage.

In addition to ensuring patients remain eligible for Medicaid coverage of essential services, states should also take steps to ensure that patients can actually receive these services amid the pandemic. Twenty-three states have expanded the types of settings in which waiver services can be provided, and a number of states have made other changes to ensure continuity of care like changing the qualifications needed for service providers or increasing the reimbursement rates for service providers. We encourage all states to take advantage of these modifications to ensure that patients remain covered for such services and receive the care that they need.

States Should Act Now

During a time of crisis, it is essential to protect the most vulnerable members in our community. We urge states – both those who have not submitted Appendix K modifications for their HCBS waivers and those who have not taken advantage of critical Appendix K opportunities – to ensure that their vulnerable residents continue to have access to the care that they need. State Medicaid officers should refer to CMS’s Appendix K page for more information on filing an application and to view approved waivers from other states.

The Massachusetts Food is medicine State Plan Case Study: The Why, How, & Lessons Learned

Since the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan was published in June of 2019, the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (CHLPI) and Community Servings, who co-authored the plan, have received numerous inquiries about the creation and implementation of the state-wide initiative. In an effort to inform the public and encourage similar initiatives outside of Massachusetts, Children’s HealthWatch, CHLPI, and Community Servings co-authored the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Case Study. The Case Study was debuted this past weekend at the Food Research & Action Center Conference (FRAC) National Anti-Hunger Policy Conference in Washington D.C. Representing CHLPI, Sarah Downer presented the findings on the panel for Food Insecurity in Health, a session that took a deep dive into three recent initiatives to advance the health and well-being of families struggling with food insecurity. 

Screen Shot 2020-03-04 at 11.15.45 AM.png

In addition to the new Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Case Study, the FRAC panel, moderated by Rich Sheward from Children’s HealthWatch, highlighted improved medical coding for advancing food insecurity screening and intervening as well as a new nutrition rating system designed for use in food banks. This year, the panel was not the only session at the FRAC conference that focused on the connection between food and health. Sarah Downer spoke to the implications of this dramatic shift:

“For a conference that just started to broach the topic nine years ago, the number of presentations focusing on food insecurity and health that were available last weekend is emblematic of the broader increased recognition of the critical connection between poverty, food insecurity, nutrition, and health as well as the opportunity to coordinate our food and health care systems.” 

The Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Case Study provides an in depth look at how the State Plan was created, spotlighting what strategies were critical to sustaining state-wide coordination and support. Complete with lessons learned, takeaways, and tips for context-specific application, the case study addresses many of the questions the team has received since the debut of the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan and the launch of Food is Medicine Massachusetts (FIMMA), a statewide, multi-sector coalition that spearheads implementation. 

As the the public continues to learn about the impact of food insecurity and nutrition on health, health care costs, and quality of life, we expect to see a rise in advocacy for programs and policies that improve access to Food is Medicine interventions. This Case Study is a vital resource for all national organizations and policymakers interested in creating their own state plans. 

Download the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Case Study to learn more today.


In support of Senate Bill 2453: A Food and Health Pilot!

Public Health hearing illustrates overwhelming support for first-in-the-nation legislation

EPEp0BPXsAEccFG.jpeg

 On January 22, 2020, only half a year since the launch of the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan the Joint Committee on Public Health gathered for the hearing on Senate Bill 2453An Act Relative to Establishing and Implementing a Food and Health Pilot Program. A diverse group of stakeholders from food and health organizations across Massachusetts attended in the State House in order to convey their support for the Pilot Program.

An Act Relative to Establishing and Implementing a Food and Health Pilot Programwas introduced to the Joint Committee on Public Health by Massachusetts Senator Julian Cyr and Representative Denise Garlick. If approved, the legislation will require the Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) to establish the Food and Health Pilot Program with the necessary funding to connect MassHealth patients that are both at risk for or suffering from diet-related conditions to one of three Food is Medicine interventions: medically tailored meals, medically tailored food packages, and nutritious food referrals such as produce prescriptions. 

CHLPI-Food-is-Medicine-Pyramid_NOVEMBER.png

Despite emerging evidence surrounding the efficacy Food is Medicine interventions to improve health and decrease health care costs, access remains limited across Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan,released in June 2019 by the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation and Community Servings comprehensively evaluated the need for, current access to, and barriers associated with improving access to Food is Medicine interventions. The initiative found that while pioneering programs exist, structural and institutional barriers—lack of integration into health care referral systems, gaps in research, and lack of sustainable funding—have historically limited the ability of these programs to scale up to meet the growing need of communities across the state. 

BLOG map.png

Implementing a Food and Health Pilot Program will test the ability of our food and health care systems to overcome these barriers, further cementing Massachusetts’s role as a leader in access to care. If enacted, Senate Bill 2453 will:

  • Add to the body of evidence supporting Food is Medicine and provide valuable data on the impact of Food is Medicine interventions on health care costs and outcomes;

  • Enhance the ability of the Massachusetts health care system to provide appropriate nutrition services based on patient need; and

  • Expand access to Food is Medicine interventions in the state.

The legislative sponsor and co-author of the bill, Senator Julian Cyr, kicked off the hearing last Wednesday and spoke to the heart of the Pilot’s mission, insisting that “This program will make Massachusetts the first state in the nation to meet the nutritional needs of patients to survive, heal and thrive.” His heartfelt testimony was followed by a panel of three national leaders in the Food is Medicine space, the Katie Garfield form Center for Health Law and Policy, David Waters of Community Servings, and Dariush Mozaffarian, Dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy who set the stage highlighting the findings in the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan, discussing the inextricable link between nutrition and health outcomes, and reviewing research illustrating the impact of these critical interventions. Fourteen stakeholders provided testimony throughout the hearing representing health care providers, community-based organizations, Food is Medicine consumers, and research centers, all in support of the legislation. 

Massachusetts has always been a national leader in health care policy, especially in state-wide efforts to address the social determinants of health. We have led the way in ensuring universal access to health insurance coverage, and we remain at the forefront of innovative reforms such as implementing value-based reimbursement. However, we continue to struggle with two issues that play a fundamental role in driving both poor health outcomes and health care costs: food insecurity and diet-related disease. During the hearing, Dean Mozaffarian pointed to nutrition as “the single biggest overlooked aspect of health.” He warned that the failure to include nutrition in health care will come at the expense of “American longevity,” and the first step to preventing a reality where “more Americans are sick than healthy” is treating diet-related conditions with better food.   

“This bill means something for all chronic diseases that are impacted by holistic approach to health. I haven’t been sick at all for the past seven months. I thank Community Servings for the work they do to keep me engaged and cared for.” -David Brown,  Community Servings Client

circles blog.png

Food insecurity, or the lack of consistent access to enough food for an active, healthy life, impacts one out of every ten households in Massachusetts, and results in $1.9 billion in avoidable health care costs each year. For many households, improving basic access to nutritious foods through programs like SNAP may be sufficient to improve health. However, for individuals living with or at risk for serious health conditions affected by diet, these strategies fall short. These individuals not only need access to nutritious foods but also equitable access to Food is Medicine interventions — foods specifically tailored to address the impacts of their health conditions. 

During the hearing, Katie Garfield clearly laid out the three critical outcomes that the bill will achieve if enacted:

  • Add to the body of evidence supporting Food is Medicine and fill the critical gaps in research on the impact of Food is Medicine interventions on health care costs and outcomes; 

  • Enhance the ability of the Massachusetts health care system to provide appropriate nutrition services based on patient need; and 

  • Expand access to Food is Medicine interventions in the state, addressing funding as a key barrier. 

While pioneering programs currently exist, structural and institutional barriers including lack of integration into health care referral systems, gaps in research, and lack of sustainable funding limit the ability of these programs to scale up and meet the growing needs of communities across the state. To that end, Kumara Sidhartha, the Medical Director of Cape Cod Healthcare, testified that this program’s transformative potential would be found in the “creation and evaluation of a comprehensive program as opposed to the piecemeal programs that exist.”

“We need resources to make this vital connection that would benefit from this pilot program. This helps to build the connection providers have to local sources, medical offices, and food markets so that communities can more readily streamline services to patients and offset bad effects of living in a food dessert. This is a great program because it helps to de-stigmatize the hunger conversation for optimal patient support.” -Representative Mindy Domb

Many of those that testified specifically emphasized the ways in which this program will be able to build upon the newly implemented Flexible Services program in Massachusetts. Under the program, MassHealth Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) receive funding that can be used to meet the housing and/or nutrition needs of eligible patients. While this innovative program represents an incredible leap forward in Massachusetts’s ability to address the needs of some of its most vulnerable residents, it faces several limitations. The most notable deficiency being the specification that Flexible Services dollars are restricted to address the needs of individual patients; they cannot be used to provide broader support to the patient’s household. In hopes of amending the Food and Health Pilot to address the household level, testimonials stressed the need for expansive funds to optimize the impact of the program and ensure that patients need not choose between prioritizing their health status and feeding their family. Dean Mozaffarian asserted his confidence for this amendment to illustrate medical benefit, relieving legislature concerns in his testimony that, “it would be blind of us not to see that food will be shared” and eliminating the option for household funding poses the risk of diluting the effects of an otherwise successful intervention“when in fact a parent gives food to child or elderly couples share food.”

Senate Bill 2453 will create opportunities to improve access to Food is Medicine interventions in both the short and long-term. The allocation of concrete, direct funds will not only expand current programs to new populations and geographies under the Pilot but also provide critical data that can be used as the foundation for policies and partnerships to support expansion on a much broader scale. Rachel Weil of the Greater Boston Food Bank proudly said that this program will “foster better collaboration to improve the health and lives of the commonwealth population.” While there is much work to be done, this Senate hearing marked an incredible first step on the path to ensuring that Food is Medicine interventions become and are acknowledged as invaluable pieces of the Massachusetts healthcare system. 

Thank you to everyone who testified in support of the Food and Health Pilot Program, including: 

Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Launches!!

David Brown Quote.JPG

After years of hard work, the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation of Harvard Law School (CHLPI), Community Servings, and nearly 40 Planning Council organizations debuted the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan at the Massachusetts State House on Tuesday June 18, 2019. With the support from legislative sponsors Senator Julian Cyr and Representative Denise Garlick, the event drew over 200 people with a line out the door comprised of government officials, non-profit group members, health care providers, health care payers, public health advocates, food systems practitioners, and academics from across the state. The launch of the State Plan was also highlighted by WBUR, who quickly published a story on the morning’s events.

The Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan initiative brought together hundreds of individuals and organizations, all united by the belief that food is medicine. Research increasingly shows that Food is Medicine interventions—such as medically tailored meals and produce prescription programs—are an effective, low-cost strategy to improve overall health outcomes, decrease utilization of expensive health care services, and enhance quality of life for people living with, or are at risk for, serious diet-related medical conditions. Present at the State Plan Launch were David Brown, a client of Community Servings’ medically tailored meal delivery program, and Max Makowski, a client of FLAVORx’s produce prescription program. Brown and Makowski spoke avidly to the audience about how Food is Medicine services improved their lives and health, reminding us that food and nutrition are crucial for people living with chronic illnesses.

Max Quote.JPG

In his remarks, Senator Julian Cyr called attention to the massive, avoidable $1.9 billion in health care spending stemming from food insecurity each year. “Part of the reason Food is Medicine is so important and has so much promise is the potential for not only improving quality of life, access, and getting at food insecurity, but the potential for cost savings as well,” said Cyr. “Because of the State Plan, we have a blueprint now to equip our health care system to identify and respond to food insecurity.”

The State Plan provides a framework for creating a health care system that truly recognizes the critical relationship between food and health and ensures access to nutrition services needed to treat, manage, and even prevent diet-related chronic diseases. Representative Denise Garlick said passionately, “I feel that food is such a ubiquitous part of our day to day life. We have always had the power; we just haven’t utilized our power.”

infographic.JPG

As the keynote of the event, a panel of experts discussed the origins and next steps for the State Plan. Robert Greenwald, Faculty Director of the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, conveyed that Massachusetts has always been a leader in health care policy, setting the tone for broader health reforms across the country. “We are making progress but much more work needs to be done,” said Greenwald. “The good news is we now have a State Plan that includes very specific recommendations as to what it's going to take to create a fully integrated health care system”.

The State Plan Report provides 15 recommendations, known as the Food is Medicine 15. These recommendations outline specific, concrete action items for key stakeholders within the world of nutrition, food, and health. It also establishes a Massachusetts Food is Medicine Coalition and three Task Forces charged with addressing critical barriers and driving broader systems and policy change. Inaugural leaders of each Task Force were present on the panel to discuss their vision for advancing the State Plan.

David Waters, CEO of Community Servings, asserted that, “As people are looking for new innovations, an old innovation has risen to the top, which is food.” He added, “If you want to make an impact on someone's health outcome, you'd better think about it in a holistic way of what's going on in that household...if we could also find a way to make sure that an entire household's nutrition needs are met, that's going to have the biggest impact.” In the same vein, Dr. Maryanne Bombaugh, President of the Massachusetts Medical Society stated, “Without addressing the social determinants of health, we will never have health equity.” Dr. Bombaugh placed high importance on educating health care professionals on food and nutrition to ensure patients have access to the information and care they need to heal and thrive. Richard Sheward, Director of Innovative Partnerships at Children’s HealthWatch, believed that “the State Plan is a great way of coalescing a diverse array of stakeholders around figuring out what works best” to address nutritional needs within the context of health care in the Commonwealth.

Garlick Quote.JPG

With strong leadership from individuals, organizations, and policymakers committed to achieving the goals of the State Plan, Massachusetts can achieve widespread, sustainable access to Food is Medicine interventions. The time is now for us to come together, take initiative, and continue to drive change so that all Massachusetts residents receive the nutritional services they need to live healthy, happy, and productive lives.

State Plan Launch Event Speakers:

Sarah Downer, Associate Director, Whole Person Care and Clinical Instructor on Law, Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation

Jean Terranova, Director of Food and Health Policy, Community Servings

Julian Cyr, State Senator for Cape Cod and the Islands District of Massachusetts

Denise Garlick, State Representative for the 13th District of Massachusetts

David Brown, Client, Community Servings

Katie Garfield, Staff Attorney, Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation

Robert Greenwald, Faculty Director, Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation; Clinical Professor of Law, Harvard Law School

David Waters, Chief Executive Officer, Community Servings

Dr. Maryanne Bombaugh, President, Massachusetts Medical Society; Gynecologist, Community Health Center of Cape Cod

Richard Sheward, Director of Innovative Partnerships, Children’s HealthWatch

Max Makowski, Client, FLAVORx

CHLPI is deeply committed to advancing the goals of the State Plan and establishing more coordinated and integrated food and health systems. To learn more, you can stream the video recording of the Massachusetts Food is Medicine State Plan Launch on our Facebook page.

New Research Highlights the Promise of Food is Medicine

Food insecurity and malnutrition are major drivers for poor health outcomes, population disparities and soaring health care spending. Roughly one out of every ten households in Massachusetts struggle with food insecurity, causing the state a staggering $1.9 billion in avoidable health care costs each year. Nutrition is increasingly recognized as a key social determinant of health because poor diet and food insecurity are connected to chronic health problems and frequent use of costly medical services.

A growing body of research shows that connecting medically complex individuals to Food is Medicine interventions, such as medically tailored meals (MTMs), is an effective and low-cost strategy to improve health outcomes, decrease expenditure of health care services, and enhance quality of life for these individuals.

Leading Food is Medicine researcher, Dr. Seth A. Berkowitz, in collaboration with Community Servings and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, has released a new study that examined the association between participation in a medically tailored meals program and health care utilization and costs. This rigorous two-year cohort study, supported by Robert Wood Johnson’s Evidence for Action Program, is the largest study to date, with 499 MTM recipients, matched to 521 nonrecipients for a total of 1020 study participants.

jama.JPG

Key Findings:

  • Participation in the medically tailored meals intervention was associated with significantly fewer inpatient admissions and fewer skilled nursing facility admissions.

  • The study model estimated that, had everyone in the matched cohort received MTMs, average individual monthly health care costs would have been $3,838 vs. $4,591, a difference of $753.

  • This difference translates to a net reduction of approximately 16% in average monthly health care costs.

The findings from this study align with Community Servings’ 2018 study on dually eligible Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries, which also found a 16 percent net reduction in health care costs for participants who received medically tailored meals. The new study builds upon this earlier research, which was restricted to Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibles, by highlighting the potential benefits of medically tailored meals for a broader segment of the population, including participants in Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance.

The ability to address nutritional needs in the context of health care is becoming increasingly important for improving population health, particularly for the nation’s most vulnerable groups. Food is Medicine interventions play an important role in managing and even preventing many of the chronic diseases that drive health care costs across the nation. Medically tailored meal programs represent promising interventions and deserve further study as we seek improve both health and the value of health care in the U.S.

CHLPI will continue to monitor developments on Food is Medicine research. Please check back with us regularly for news and updates!

Boston City Council Passes Good Food Purchasing Program

gfpp.png

Last month, the Boston City Council unanimously voted to adopt the Good Food Purchasing Program (GFPP). GFPP requires the city to meet certain requirements for nutrition, sustainability, animal welfare, and labor, when making food purchases. This policy applies to purchases made by all city agencies, and will have the greatest impact on the Boston Public Schools, which spends approximately $18 million per year on food. GFPP helps ensure that this money is used to purchase healthy food and to support sustainable and responsible producers.

GFPP was developed by the Center for Good Food Purchasing, which helps manage the adoption and implementation of GFPP by cities and institutions. According to the Center, seven GFPP policies have been passed to date at the local or institutional level.

Boston’s ordinance goes beyond the other cities, and includes particularly strong language around racial equity. The ordinance seeks to support vendors that invest in disadvantaged communities — for example, vendors that hire disadvantaged community members, are women- or minority-owned, and pay all workers living wages — by awarding these vendors bonus points in the review process for purchasing contracts.

Boston’s policy also includes robust provisions to increase transparency in the food purchasing process. FLPC worked with a coalition of local advocates to strengthen the language in order to increase opportunities for the public to have their voices heard during the procurement process. We were thrilled to see the Boston City Council adopt language to establish public hearings on purchasing recommendations and require the public release of certain materials related to purchasing, such as vendor proposals and the agency’s evaluations and recommendations of these proposals. The Boston ordinance also creates a Community Advisory Council that will assist with the implementation process.

FLPC looks forward to continuing to work with local stakeholders and with the City of Boston towards implementation of the GFPP, and applauds Boston City Council for this exciting new legislation!

For more information about Boston’s adoption of the GFPP, see the press release.

Take Two Carrots and Call Me in the Morning

Originally published by Stateline for Pew Charitable Trust on September 7, 2018. Written by Marsha Mercer.

Half a century after Americans began fighting hunger with monthly food stamps, the nation’s physicians and policymakers are focusing more than ever on what’s on each person’s plate.

In the 21st century, food is seen as medicine — and a tool to cut health care costs.

The “food is medicine” concept is simple: If chronically ill people eat a nutritious diet, they’ll need fewer medications, emergency room visits and hospital readmissions.

The food is medicine spectrum ranges from simply encouraging people to plant a garden and learn to cook healthfully, as state Sen. Judy Lee, a Republican, does in North Dakota — “We don’t do policies about gardening,” she said — to an intensive California pilot project that delivers two medically tailored meals plus snacks daily and offers three counseling sessions with a registered dietitian over 12 weeks.

The California Legislature last year became the first in the nation to fund a large-scale pilot project to test food is medicine. The three-year, $6 million project launched in April will serve about a thousand patients with congestive heart failure in seven counties.

“The state puts a huge amount of money into health care, and one of the biggest costs is medication,” Assemblyman Phil Ting, a Democrat and chairman of the Assembly Budget Committee, said in an interview. “So the hope is people will live longer and this project will also reduce the need for medication.”

The food is medicine concept has been around for a while. Since the 1980s, nonprofits such as Project Open Hand in San Francisco, Community Servings in Boston, God’s Love We Deliver in New York and MANNA or Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition Alliance in Philadelphia have provided medically tailored meals for patients with HIV, diabetes, cancer and heart disease. They are largely funded by donations and grants.

Seeing the programs’ successes, some states are taking a larger role. Massachusetts is developing a food is medicine plan with a goal of integrating programs scattered around the state so more residents can benefit. Legislative policy proposals are expected next spring.

Food is medicine goes beyond traditional advice to eat more fruits and vegetables. Projects pay for people to purchase produce and offer nutrition counseling and cooking classes, so they’ll know which foods to choose or avoid and how to prepare them. For example, watermelon is healthy for some, but not for a diabetic.  

On the local level, a community garden managed by a teenager in Sylvester, Georgia, aims — with the help of the local hospital — to improve the health of the town in the nation’s “stroke belt.”

Physicians in a dozen states write “prescriptions” for fruits and vegetables at farmers markets and groceries — scripts that can be exchanged for tokens to buy produce.

“Food is medicine is an idea whose day has arrived,” said Robert Greenwald, faculty director of the Harvard Law School’s Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, one of the experts who testified in January at the launch of the congressional Food is Medicine Working Group, part of the House Hunger Caucus.

The Senate version of the farm bill includes Harvesting Health, a pilot project to test fruit-and-vegetable prescriptions. It’s modeled on work by Wholesome Wave, a Bridgeport, Connecticut, nonprofit that works with health centers in a dozen states where doctors write prescriptions for produce.

If enacted, the federal government would spend $20 million over five years on grants to states or nonprofits to provide fruits and vegetables and nutrition education to low-income patients with diet-related conditions.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the food stamp program known as SNAP, helps reduce food insecurity for 39.6 million participants, but studies do not show SNAP improves nutrition. Instead, there seems to be a correlation between long-term food stamp participation and excess weight gain.

Poor diet was No. 1 of 17 leading risk factors for death in the United States in 2016 — a higher risk than smoking, drug use, lack of exercise and other factors, according to “The State of US Health,” a comprehensive report by a team of academics published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in April.

Dr. Kumara Sidhartha, an internal medicine specialist and medical director at Emerald Physicians on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, conducted a prescription study with Medicaid participants in 2016 and 2017. In his study, he wrote prescriptions or vouchers for one group to buy $30 in produce a week at the farmers market, and gave another $30 in gasoline vouchers a week — for 12 weeks. Both groups received cooking classes and nutrition counseling.

Twenty-four people completed the program, and those who received the fruit and vegetable prescriptions showed improvements in risk factors for chronic disease — better body mass index, total blood cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c, Sidhartha said.

“Patients and physicians are so used to the physician writing prescriptions for procedures and pills,” he said. “This changes the health care culture of how the prescription is used.”  

Proponents of the California project hope it will demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of including medically tailored meals as an essential health benefit covered by Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program.

“This is potentially transformative because the health care system has been designed to cover acute services, and not many prevention programs are covered,” said Dr. Hilary Seligman, an associate professor at the University of California-San Francisco, one of two physician researchers who will evaluate the project by tracking participants’ medical records.

“For someone with congestive heart failure, their lives depend on their capacity to eat a lower salt diet,” Seligman said. “Making the food as appealing as possible is very important.”

Some legislators are skeptical about government moving into new food delivery systems.

“We need to feed the children who are hungry now. We need the backpack programs in school, the free and reduced-price breakfast and lunches to make sure that nobody is hungry today,” said North Dakota’s Lee, chairwoman of the state Senate Human Services Committee, at a food is medicine session at the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Hunger Partnership conference in July.

“But then we need to take those same children and help them learn how to do those things for themselves,” Lee said. “Let’s have a short-term solution: Let’s feed people. And then let’s have a longer-term solution: Help them feed themselves.”

Everyone in her state could have a garden, even apartment-dwellers, and they can learn to cook, she said, adding that cooking is a skill that’s been lost since schools there dropped home economics.

“Kids can learn and a parent can learn how to make a meal,” Lee said in an interview. “I’d rather figure out a way to give them cooking lessons with food. We’re not helping children become functional adults by giving them three meals a day.”

It’s not government’s job to provide every meal, she said, adding, “That’s the good news about North Dakota, compared with the Northeast and California.” 

Georgia state Sen. Renee Unterman, a Republican and chairwoman of the state Senate Health and Human Services Committee and co-chairwoman of the NCSL hunger partnership, suggested at the food is medicine session that a community garden with a medical purpose in her state — and started by a child — could be a model.

16x9_M.jpg

Village Community Garden manager Janya Green was 12 when she started on the community garden as her 4-H Club project three years ago on 5 acres donated by the town of Sylvester, population 6,000, about 170 miles south of Atlanta. Anyone can pick free vegetables and fruit whenever they like. The garden features cabbage, carrots, kale, okra, bell peppers, squash, sweet potatoes, blackberries, blueberries, muscadine grapes and even bananas. Herbs are next.

A pond is stocked with fish, so residents can reel in healthy protein as well. A local county commissioner gave lumber for a 20- by 60-foot stage.

Phoebe Worth Medical Center installed an outdoor kitchen in the garden for chef-taught cooking classes. Darrell Sabbs, governmental affairs specialist at the medical center, hopes researchers from Emory University or the University of Georgia will study the health statistics of the neighborhood and gauge the garden’s health effects.

Dr. Marilyn Carter, an internal medicine physician who also trained as a pharmacist, lives in Sylvester and volunteers at the garden. She and a nutritionist wrote up health benefits of the produce for signs that will help people make smart choices.

“We’re in the stroke belt,” Carter pointed out, adding that many of her patients have heart disease and diabetes. People eat a typical Southern diet of fried foods and foods out of boxes that are high calorie and high fat, she said.

“I want people to know, ‘If I eat more kale and less white rice, my blood pressure will be better,’” she said. Her name for the garden: the Farmacy.